Three senate Democrats, Barbara Boxer, Edward Markey and Sheldon Whitehouse are in a standoff with the Koch Brothers currently, who are refusing to discuss their involvement with funding scientific studies studies that always somehow seem to say that climate change isnt real, while the rest of the scientific world agrees that it is one of the biggest long-term problems we face. The goal is simple, said Senator Markey:
Corporate interests shouldnt be able to secretly peddle the best junk science that money can buy.
The senators launched their probe shortly after climate researcher Willie Soon was accused of accepting more than $1.2 million from oil, gas and coal companies in exchange for his research questioning the role of greenhouse gases in climate change.
But, The Kochs think Congress can stick it where the sun dont shine. They say they have 64 billion reasons why it is none of Congress business. And, each one is for every dollar they have.
Mark Holden, the general counsel for the 5th and 6th richest guys in the world had this to say about the Senators inquiry:
Your letter touches on matters that implicate the First Amendment. I am sure you recognize Kochs right to participate in the debate of important public policy issues and its right of free association.
This is not just about participating in public debate, though. Nor is it about even using their massive amounts of money to gain more attention in the free press. What they are doing is deceptive, and intentionally trying to make climate change seem like a hoax, by having so-called independent organizations and scientists claim that the science doesnt support climate change.
Koch, which owns subsidiaries in industries like oil refining, agricultural supply and paper products, was one of 100 companies that Markey, Boxer and Whitehouse are investigating.
The senators are calling for these thinktanks that throw out these studies as evidence, to show who is funding them.
The letter they sent was just a first step asking for the information. The next step will be making them do it.
But, the Koch Brothers are remaining mum, for now. And, theyre betting the republican puppets they put in office are going to bail them out. After all, they are spending $1 billion alone, just for the 2016 Presidential election. This is an insane amount of money to influence elections for just one family.
Watch this short video to see how just how bad it is:
H/T: Next Gen Climate | Featured Image: Koch Brothers
Its no secret that our planet is in a pretty dire condition. Extinction rates have been estimated to be about 1,000 times higher than they should be, and thats all due to human influenceand interference. With around 20,000 species at risk for extinction and countless others that we havent even discovered yet also dying, scientists are rushing to figure out what we can do about it. Some have suggested the sixth great mass extinction is looming on the horizon, and the problem is a massive one. Its so big that there are things that you do every day that are helping to bring about the end of the world, and chances are that you might not even know it.
10 Using Disposable Chopsticks
Chances are good that you dont even think about environmental impact when you pull a pair of wooden chopsticks out with your order of takeout, but those chopsticks are having a devastating impact on Chinas forests. China produces a whopping 80 billion disposable chopsticks every year. The vast majority are usedand thrown awayin China itself. A mind-blowing number, 80 billion is enough to blanket Beijings Tiananmen Square in at least 360 layers of chopsticks.
That kind of production takes 20 million trees, and not just any trees. Twenty-year-old trees. The impact of that is exactly as bad as youd think. China suffers from a major deforestation problem for no reason other than chopsticks. Its also not helped by the fact that demand for disposable wooden chopsticks is increasing dramatically, up from 57 billion in 2009. Thats resulted in China ranking somewhere around 139th place when it comes to per capita forest coverage with less than a quarter of the worlds average.
The problem has gotten so bad that China is now imposing restrictions on the production of chopsticks, limiting quantities companies can produce and increasing the taxes imposed on purchases. Theyre also starting a big push to introduce the idea of carrying reusable chopsticks in a bid to aid in the recovery of the nations forests. By 2020, they hope to add 40 million hectares of trees, but that can only happen if they can alleviate some of the stress placed on the environment by chopsticks.
9 Birth Control Is Working On Fish, Too
Know anyone whos on the pill? Theyre also spreading pregnancy prevention to marine wildlife, and thats a problem.
In 2014, researchers at the University of New Brunswick released the results of a study that had been going on for several decades. They were looking at wastewater treatment and its impact on freshwater ecosystems, and they found that even trace amounts of estrogen in the environment can wipe out entire species.
In 2001, a small amount of estrogen, one of the active ingredients in birth control pills and hormone therapy treatments, was introduced into a freshwater lake research facility in Ontario. The impact was almost immediate. Male fish first began producing egg proteins and then producing eggs. Even tiny trace amounts were enough to feminize the male fish, which led to a complete crash of the ecosystem. The insect populations normally kept in check by the fish suddenly skyrocketed. As the minnow population plummeted, so did the population of the lake trout that fed on them.
Its not just happening in research facilities, either. Calgarys Red Deer and Oldman rivers have been hit by the same problem. The cause has been traced back to the release of improperly treated wastewater that contains hormones from hormone therapy drugs and birth control pills. Hormones that arent absorbed or used end up in the sewer system after they cycle through the human body. In areas where that sewer water is dumped into lakes and rivers, the average fish population is about 85 percent female, a stark contrast to the normal 55 percent. Fish exposed to the hormones not only lose the ability to reproduce, but their accidental hormone treatment impacts eggs at the development stage as well.
8 Birds On Prozac
Record numbers of people are taking antidepressant drugs like Prozac. While many of them might be concerned primarily about feeling different, they should also be concerned about what theyre doing to the environment.
According to a study from the University of York, the amount of antidepressants (specifically Prozac) that are found in the environment can be potentially devastating to birds. They started by measuring the amount of Prozac that made its way into the earthworms that were feeding on sewage and wastewater. The dose was small, only about 3 to 5 percent of an average human dose. They then fed the Prozac-laced worms to a group of 24 starlings and recorded their behavior for the next six months.
The birds began to show the same side effects to the drug that are reported in humans. They lost interest in food and stopped eating. They also lost interest in starlings of the opposite sex. The two main side effects have dual impacts; their loss of interest in food makes them weaker and less likely to make it through winter months, and their loss of libido has the potential to severely impact breeding numbers.
The birds didnt seem to have any of the good effects of Prozac. Their general mood and disposition remained the same. Just how widespread an impact this could have on the worlds bird populations isnt known, but its thought that it might have something to do with the decline in the starling population over the last few decadesto the tune of about 50 million birds.
7 Using Straws
Chances are good that if you get a cold drink at any restaurant, youll be handed a straw, too. We curse the people working the drive-through when were halfway down the block and realize we dont have one, but straws are having a pretty devastating impact on our planet.
Every day, the United States alone uses about 500 million drinking straws. For a visual, that means we could fill 46,400 school buses with straws every year. In the last 25 years, about six million of those have been picked up on beaches across the country during annual cleanups. Those are just part of the sum that ends up on the beach, and according to the Ocean Conservancy, drinking straws rank in the top 10 types of trash found floating in the ocean.
Straws are light, easily picked up by wind and water currents, and made from a polypropylene plastic that doesnt disintegrate or dissolve. These millions of straws are around forever, making up a huge part of the estimated 12 to 24 tons of plastic that ends up ingested by fish and other marine wildlife every year. And that includes about one million seabirds that die after eating plastics. One of the most common items found in autopsies? The drinking straws that come attached to juice boxes.
6 Eating Frog
Far from exclusively a fancy French entree, frog is such a popular food that it has become a huge global industry. Bullfrogs are typically raised on farms in South America. They are then either used there for food or shipped overseas. Japan and the United States are two of the biggest consumers of frogs, with more than five million imported into the US alone each year. Thats proving fatal for countless amphibiansand not just those being eaten.
Many of the bullfrogs shipped out of South America are infected with chytrid fungus. The fungus is completely harmless to humans. The North American bullfrog is highly resistant to it, making them the ideal carrier for the fungal disease that can infect toads, salamanders, and other types of frogs.
The fungus thats being spread by the live food trade is different than one thats being blamed for most of the recent die-offs. Its thought that the strain is not only being spread, but that its being hybridized into a new, extremely virulent strain. There are a few different strains of the fungus, and researchers from the University of Michigan have been able to track which frogs are carrying which strains into which countries. Theyve also been able to trace which strains of the fungus can reproduce with other strains, leading to more and more different varieties of deadly fungus. The consequences of the fungus and its ability to hybridize create the potential to unleash an epidemic across the globe.
5 Using Antibacterial Soap
Theres been a lot of debate about just how effective antibacterial soaps are and whether or not they should even be marketed, but using them has been proven to have an impact on the environment.
Johns Hopkins University Center for Water and Health has done a study on just what happens to all the antibacterial chemicals in your antibacterial soaps after they swirl down the drain. The most commonly used chemicals are triclocarban and triclosan, and while most of those chemicals are removed from wastewater when theyre run through a treatment plant, they have to go somewhere. That somewhere is sewage sludge, which is then recycled for agricultural use. From there, those chemicals are transferred into the ground and ultimately into surface water.
When triclocarban degrades, it degrades into two chemicalsboth carcinogens. When triclosan is run through a treatment plant to make drinking water, it doesnt exactly make safe drinking water. Instead, it makes other chemicals that can include chloroform. And those chemicals travel through the food chain in plants, animals, and ultimately humans. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found traces of the chemicals originating with antibacterial soap in 75 percent of urine samples tested, all taken from people over five years old.
Triclosan has been shown to interfere with the basic biological systems of a number of animals, including rats and a range of amphibians. It interferes with thyroid function, and when it builds up in the body, it causes early puberty in young animals, infertility, obesity, and cancer. Triclosan collects in the bodys fatty tissues, and since animalsand humansare higher up on the food chain, that means were consuming all the trace amounts found in lower animals and getting a massive dose of the stuff.
4 Keeping The Family Cat
If you have an indoor cat, you probably go through a lot of cat litter. Its a pretty new invention, only around since 1947 when a Michigan woman asked Edward Lowe if he knew of an alternative to the sand or ash that she had been using. Lowe, who worked in the industrial absorbents business, gave her some clayand the rest is history.
There is, of course, a big problem with that history. For decades, at least 75 percent of the different brands of cat litter available were made from bentonite clay. The clay is what gives the litter its scoopable quality. Considering America alone uses about 2 million tons of cat litter every year, thats a lot of clay the industry needs.
So how do we get it? Strip mining. Lots and lots of strip mining. While thats bad no matter the angle, some people have had it incredibly bad. In 1989, Canadas Mineral Tenure Act was amended to include one of the key ingredients in cat litterdiatomaceous earth. That meant that suddenly, companies had the right of free entry onto peoples land without a time limit to look for valuable minerals. Landowners in Canada have found their property strip mined for cat litter. Technically, landowners need to be compensated, but that process can take years. The Bepple family was one such victim, finding a plot of land they once used for grazing livestock and farming trees suddenly being strip mined for cat litter.
There are tons of alternatives to clay litter on the market, from recycled paper litter to wood and plant-based litters. Those options arent always widely available, though. In many cases, they can be incredibly costly.
3 Eating Farm-Raised Fish
If theres anything that seems like its an eco-friendly dinner choice, its farm-raised fish. Youre not removing fish from the open ocean, youre not putting other animals in danger, and youre not even adding to emissions given off from fishing boats. But farm-raised fish come with their own set of problems, and theyre definitely not the eco-friendly choice youd think.
Shrimp aquaculture has resulted in the large-scale degradation of coastal areas, the destruction of wetlands, and salinization of freshwater areas and drinking water. Salmon farming relies on the release of fish food and nutrients into the water, which always results in wasted feed and a huge amount of fish droppings in the water. Thats normally not a problem, but when a lot of fish are farmed in a small area, its too much for the ecosystem to handle naturally.
Extra waste products end up sinking to the bottom where they react with the medicines and other nutrients used to keep the fish healthy along with antifoulant agents used to keep nets clean. That means fish farms are a breeding ground for sea lice, which are as disgusting as they sound. More chemicals are used to control the sea lice, which end up killing the other marine life that was supposed to be in the area in the first place.
Theres also the very, very good chance that nonnative species of farmed fish are going to escape. Thats introducing an invasive species to an ecosystem not prepared to handle it, and that means a whole other set of problems. Like many other environmental problems, theres absolutely no easy answer. Environmental agencies are now looking for ways to improve husbandry practices worldwide.
2 Eating Soy
Turning to soy products has long been heralded as the healthier, more eco-friendly, and certainly more cow-friendly alternative to dairy products. Unfortunately, recent studies have shown that the environmental impact of soybean production is pretty devastating, too.
Soybeans arent just used in products like milk substitutes. Theyre also being used for non-consumables like soap and candles. And were not the only ones eating soy, either; about 80 percent of the worlds soy production goes into livestock feed.
Theres a huge demand for soy. As it grows in popularity, more space is needed to grow the beans. Since 2008, deforestation in Brazil has been on a steady decrease, a direct result of a ban implemented in order to counteract deforestation. The need for the ban comes on the heels of Greenpeaces numbers, which indicated that about 1.2 million hectares of soy was planted in Brazils rain forest in 2005 alone.
In addition to the usual impacts of things like pesticides and water use, theres a huge human rights issue thats grown up around the development of soy, too. The Brazilian government keeps a list of farms that have been caught using slave labor, and soy farms throughout the Amazon basin have been found guilty of luring people there with work, then seizing their documents and forcing them into slavery. Theres also the rather shady practice of land-grabbing, leading to countless families being kicked off land thats deemed more valuable for farming than for living.
1 Not Finishing Your Dinner
Most of us grew up hearing that wed better clean our plates, but its a bigger problem than our parents probably ever realized. Every year, global food waste amounts to about 1.3 billion tons, and thats such a big number that its impossible to imagine. Its costing us about $750 billion annually, and the environmental waste is just as staggering.
Three times the annual flow of the Volga River is wasted on producing food that gets thrown away, yielding 3.3 billion tons of greenhouse gases. About 28 percent of our agricultural land is used to produce waste food. Clearing more and more land is putting countless plants and animals at risk.
Meanwhile, about 870 million people are starving.
A lot of the waste comes at the processing levels, but consumer waste is also incredibly high. Fruits and vegetables are often thrown away for being misshapen, not necessarily spoiled. Theres a lot of food thats thrown away at the best-by date regardless of whether the food has spoiled. Many consumers think that the sell-by date and the best-by dates are the same, but thats just not the case.
While plans are in place for reducing waste like packaging food in smaller containers and offering lower prices for less-than-perfect foods, theres still a long, long way to go.